Â鶹ŮÀÉ

Skip Navigation
From left, Bob Turner, associate professor and chair of political science; former U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth, a Democrat from Kentucky; former U.S. Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle, a Republican from New York; and political science major Sam Severs ’27 during a panel on how to work in American politics.
From left, Bob Turner, associate professor and chair of political science; former U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth, a Democrat from Kentucky; former U.S. Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle, a Republican from New York; and political science major Sam Severs ’27 during a panel on how to work in American politics – part of a multi-day visit of the former lawmakers to campus.

Former lawmakers call for civility, bipartisan dialogue

Republican Ann Marie Buerkle and Democrat John Yarmuth discuss political polarization, congressional gridlock, and civil discourse during a two-day campus visit.

Two former members of Congress from opposing political parties brought different perspectives on the nation’s challenges to Â鶹ŮÀÉ but shared a conviction that political disagreements should not prevent Americans from working together. 

Former U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth, a Democrat from Kentucky, and former U.S. Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle, a Republican from New York, discussed political polarization, congressional dysfunction, and civic engagement during “Making Congress Work Again: A Bipartisan Discussion with Former Members of Congress” on Oct. 7 in Gannett Auditorium. 

The discussion, moderated by senior political senior majors Kate Sterling ’27 and Parker Kinney ’27, was part of a multi-day campus visit through the Congress to Campus program that also included visits to several Skidmore courses and meetings with students. 

In opening remarks, Bob Turner, associate professor and chair of political science, praised the former lawmakers for modeling “political tolerance and acceptance” despite political differences. 

President Marc C. Conner emphasized that the program reflects Â鶹ŮÀÉ’s commitment to preparing students for responsible democratic citizenship through free speech and expression, open dialogue, and engagement with differing perspectives. 

“We’ve also emerged in recent years as one of the national examples of championing freedom of speech, academic freedom, and seeking out multiple perspectives,” Conner said. “I don’t want to be in a place where everybody agrees. We need to seek out difference, especially those opinions with which we most strongly disagree.” 

Both former lawmakers expressed concern about the consequences of growing partisanship and gridlock. 

“It’s not what the merits of a particular proposal might be for immigration or education or whatever. It’s which jersey is that person wearing who introduced that proposal,” Yarmuth said. 

He argued that partisan divisions increasingly encourage lawmakers to prioritize electoral advantage over governing. 

“There is no governing mentality anymore. It’s always an electoral mentality. So whatever the issue is, it’s not, ‘What is the best way to deal with this problem?’ It’s, ‘How do I get an electoral advantage over the other side?’” 

Yarmuth also questioned whether Congress can address increasingly complex challenges, such as healthcare, immigration, and artificial intelligence. 

“Congress at its optimum efficiency moves at 10 miles an hour, and we’re nowhere near optimum right now. It’s more like two miles an hour,” he said. “The world’s changing at 100 miles an hour and we can’t keep up.” 

Buerkle expressed concern that Congress has relinquished too much authority to the executive branch, calling for greater oversight of federal agencies. 

 “Congress should be paying much closer attention to make sure that the laws they pass are enforced the way they intended,” she said. 

Both former lawmakers also challenged the perception that members of opposing parties necessarily dislike one another, arguing that relentless news coverage exaggerates partisan hostility. 

“The misconception is that we hate each other. The Democrats hate the Republicans. It’s not that way,” Buerkle said. 

She emphasized the importance of distinguishing philosophical disagreements from judgments about people's character. 

“I don’t think their policies are evil. I philosophically disagree with them, and that’s a big difference,” Buerkle said. “I think that I look at the role of government as one way and John looks at it as another way. It doesn't make him evil, doesn't make me good or bad either.” 

Buerkle also praised forums like the one at Skidmore for helping lower the temperature of political debate and encouraging dialogue across party lines. 

“It’s policy you disagree with, not the person. Don’t make it personal,” she said. 

The lawmakers stressed the importance of civic education and a better understanding of how government works and how citizens can participate in democracy. 

Buerkle also challenged students to embrace Â鶹ŮÀÉ’s Creative Thought Matters ethos by seeking different perspectives and applying creative thinking to the challenges their generation will inherit. 

“Don’t just be content with the information that you’re comfortable with. Look to other sources,” she said. “Be more creative and be more curious and really be serious about finding solutions.” 

“This is all going on your shoulders,” she reminded students. “You’re going to be graduating and the responsibility and the problems and the issues, you’re going to be carrying them and trying to figure them out.”